Teaching Tip: Planning for HyFlex Teaching with a “Run of Show” Template 

This tip is part of a series on HyFlex and synchronous teaching. HyFlex teaching is a broader model but can include livestreaming your face-to-face teaching in a synchronous format. This skill is complex, and I would suggest that using a “pre-flight” checklist, like the idea that pilots check their technology before taking off, is an essential part of HyFlex and synchronous (live) teaching. It requires intentional planning by design to support both in-person and online students equally and to have a professional session.

Failing to plan intentionally in a HyFlex environment puts learning at risk and adds stress. Students’ engagement and learning suffer without structure

A simple planning template or “run of show” helps structure class flow, balance participation, and ensures everyone has meaningful ways to engage and access the learning and technology. Clear design models good online-focused teaching: organization, access, interactivity, and good design.  

Some aspects of this planning template include: 
  • Planning for audio and video quality control checks prior to the class or meeting start.  
  • Identifying who will manage what technology: instructor, online moderator(s), tech support, or student assistants. Decide who will assist with managing the chat window, helping with audio (e.g., using external microphones if the room doesn’t have ambient microphones built in), etc.    
  • Prepare activities that work equally well online and in-person (e.g., polls, shared docs for real-time writing or collaboration, group discussions). Build pauses or moments for engagement and check-ins for all participation modes. What will be the plan to pause instruction to do an active learning task (e.g., poll, chat window discussion) to connect those online with those in the class? 
  • If you are having students interact in real-time: Leverage the chat window heavily as a dialogic shared learning space. Those in the classroom can also login to the meeting to participate with those joining online. Students can volunteer to strategically assist with the chat window, and this can rotate weekly. 

A “pre-flight” style checklist run-of-show (example from SFSU) before HyFlex teaching or presentations transforms potential chaos into a coordinated, inclusive learning experience. Failing to plan intentionally in a HyFlex environment puts learning at risk and adds stress. Students’ engagement and learning suffer without structure. By using a session template, faculty can create seamless sessions that support all students, no matter which modality they choose. For more information on best practices in HyFlex teaching, visit the HyFlex Learning Community online. Next week, the CRTLE Team will share more on how to do HyFlex and synchronous learning during the class or presentation. 

teaching with a mobile camera recording the class session

Resource:

An example of a facilitation plan from one of CRTLE’s recent HyFlex events is below and here:

Run of Show Detailed Agenda for October 15, 2025

Regular and Substantive Instruction

12:00-1:00 PM.

Hybrid: Trinity Hall 105 & Teams

From UTA:

  • Tyler Garner (Facilitator)
  • Sarah Sarraj (panelist)
  • Heather Arterburn (panelist)
  • Christy Spivey (panelist)

Room setup:

  • Chairs and/or table up front for four panelists
    • Check to make sure room camera works/will get the whole panel
  • Hand mic to pass around during panel questions and Q&A after
  • PowerPoint parts before and after panel
    • Check to see how this interferes with panel (if at all). Do we want the screen blanked behind them or a slide, etc.

CRTLE Support:

  • Peggy Semingson: Introduction
  • Sarah Shelton: in-room help (setup, get technology going, etc.); help facilitate mic sharing/movement and PowerPoint slides (if needed); will monitor the chat when not doing the above
  • NaKesha Brown: monitor chat online; drop links, etc.
  • Yousif Aloufi: monitor chat; drop links, etc.

Include a detailed minute by minute agenda (in time segments, e.g., 1:00-1:10 pm) using headings like the one below in a table:

TimePresenter and ActivityChat window content: Tech notes/things to paste into the chat. Links, PowerPoint, handouts, etc.


Join Us for a Two-Day Author Event: Teaching with AI

A Practical Guide to a New Era of Human Learning

UTA welcomes José Antonio Bowen and C. Edward Watson, authors of Teaching with AI: A Practical Guide to a New Era of Human Learning, for an exclusive two-day event. Join us for insightful sessions on embracing AI in education and preparing students for the future.

This event is limited to UTA-affiliated registrants only.

Day 1: Wednesday, November 19th

Embracing AI as Essential Learning: Preparing Students for Life Beyond College

Generative AI tools have had an astonishingly quick impact on the ways we learn, work, think, and create. While higher education’s initial response was to develop strategies to diminish AI’s influence in the classroom, it is now clear that AI competencies and literacies must be embraced as essential learning for most colleges and universities. These responses and realities create a challenging tension that higher education must work to resolve. Drawing from the new, second edition of the book, Teaching with AI: A Practical Guide to a New Era of Human Learning (Johns Hopkins University Press, 2025), Dr. C. Edward Watson will detail the challenges and opportunities that have emerged for higher education, especially in terms of pedagogical practice and student learning. The core focus of this keynote will be on concrete approaches and strategies higher education can adopt, both within the classroom and across larger curricular structures, to best prepare students for the life that awaits them after graduation. It will also detail the pedagogical possibilities regarding how AI can have a positive impact on student learning.

Time: 1:30 pm – 3:00 pm

Location: Trinity Hall, Room 104 or Teams (Hybrid)

Presenter: C. Edward Watson

Register here now

Day 2: Thursday, November 20th

Simulations, Custom Bots and New Assignments for Learning in the AI Era

All assignments are now AI Assignments. In the same way that the ease of finding information on the internet forced faculty to rethink what homework students did and how we wanted them to do it, we will all need an AI strategy for assignments. Since most work will soon be AI-assisted work, we can help prepare students for the jobs of the future with assignments that require or suggest that students use AI to assist in completing them. We will learn how to create and use custom bots and through a wide diversity of examples, explore how we can redesign to reduce cheating and raise standards.

Time: 10:00 am – 12:00 pm

Location: Trinity Hall, Room 104 or Teams (Hybrid)

Presenter: José Antonio Bowen

Register here now

Space is limited for in-person attendance. Register early to secure your spot!

Special Offer: 30% Off the Book

Get 30% off the second edition of Teaching with AI at Johns Hopkins University Press.

Order here

Discount Code: HTAI25

Event Host

Hosted by the Office of the Provost – Academic Affairs, University Analytics, Division of Faculty Success and CRTLE

We look forward to seeing you at this transformative event as we explore the intersection of AI and education!

Presenter Bios

C. Edward Watson, Ph.D., is the Vice President for Digital Innovation at the American Association of Colleges and Universities (AAC&U). He is also the founding director of AAC&U’s Institute on AI, Pedagogy, and the Curriculum. Prior to joining AAC&U, Dr. Watson was the Director of the Center for Teaching and Learning at the University of Georgia (UGA) where he led university efforts associated with faculty development, TA development, learning technologies, and the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning. He continues to serve as a Fellow in the Louise McBee Institute of Higher Education at UGA and recently stepped down after more than a decade as the Executive Editor of the International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education. His most recent publications are Teaching with AI: A Practical Guide to a New Era of Human Learning (Johns Hopkins University Press, 2024), Leading Through Disruption: Higher Education Executives Assess AI’s Impacts on Teaching and Learning (AAC&U, 2025), and the Student Guide to AI (Elon University & AAC&U, 2025). Dr. Watson been quoted in the New York Times, Chronicle of Higher Education, Inside Higher Ed, Campus Technology, EdSurge, Newsweek, U.S. News, EdTech, Consumer Reports, UK Financial Times, and University Business Magazine and by the AP, CNN and NPR regarding current teaching and learning issues and trends in higher education.

José Antonio Bowen has won teaching awards at Stanford and Georgetown, was Dean at Miami and Southern Methodist University and President of Goucher College. He has written over 100 scholarly articles and has appeared as a musician with Stan Getz, Bobby McFerrin, and others. He is the author of Teaching Naked (2012, the winner of the Ness Award for Best Book on Higher Education), Teaching Change: How to Develop Independent Thinkers using Relationships, Resilience and Reflection (2021) and Teaching with AI: A Practical Guide to a New Era of Human Learning with C. Edward Watson (2024; 2nd edn 2026). Stanford honored him as a Distinguished Alumni Scholar (2010) and he has presented more than 500 keynotes and workshops in 47 states and 24 countries around the world. In 2018, he was awarded the Ernest L. Boyer Award (for significant contributions to American higher education). He is now a senior fellow for the American Association of Colleges and Universities and also does innovation and inclusion consulting for a wide variety of Fortune 500 companies.

Resources/Preparing for the Event: Learn More About AI and Teaching

The following curated resources provide guidance on understanding, integrating, and teaching with AI across higher education contexts.

Prompting and Communication with AI


Designing Assignments and Learning with AI


Assessment, Integrity, and Policy


Tools, Frameworks, and Teaching Resources


UTA Professional Development Opportunities


Research and Innovative Teaching Strategies


The Mid-Semester Power Play: Stop Fearing Feedback and Start Seeking It

This post was written by Dr. Tyler Garner, Clinical Assistant Professor in Kinesiology (CONHI) at The University of Texas at Arlington.

The semester often feels like a non-stop sprint. You power through the first few weeks, execute the first big exam, and then you’re sprinting toward the finish line. But then the questions come in, the requests for office hours. For many of us, this period is often coupled with a quiet doubt, and maybe even a whisper of imposter syndrome. We fear that asking “Am I doing this right?” might expose some flaw. But the time between that first exam and the final is arguably the most critical period for intervention, and it demands vulnerability. It’s the perfect moment to pause and ask the most important question, not from a place of fear, but from a commitment to mastery: is what we’re doing working?

This is the secret power play: choosing to be transparent about your process. Yes, it demands vulnerability, but it immediately reframes you as a leader in the classroom who is secure enough to seek feedback to optimize

I faced this vulnerability head on recently when I conducted an exam debrief with my students, and I asked two simple questions:

  1. What can you do better to prepare for the next exam?
  2. What can I do better to help you prepare for the next exam?

The students were surprised that I was asking their opinion on what I could be doing better. Several expressed that they had never been asked that before. This confirmed a truth every educator needs to embrace: Self-evaluation should be proactive, not retrospective. Waiting until final course evaluations means you collect data you can only use next year. A mid-semester check-in provides real-time, actionable insights that directly benefit the current group of students.

The Collaborative Core of Learning

The true impact of those two questions wasn’t just the feedback; it was the shift in perspective. By asking students what they could do better first, I established that academic success is a collaborative process, not a solo performance. It wasn’t about “just me” fixing my teaching, or “just them” studying harder. It was an opportunity for us to grow together.

This approach defines a new learning contract: We are partners, and the exam results are diagnostic for both of our strategies. We’re working toward mastery as a team, and if the class isn’t meeting goals, both the instruction and the student approach deserve scrutiny. This shared ownership minimizes blame and maximizes constructive, collaborative action.

Starting the Conversation with Students

This collaborative spirit is why the student check-in is so vital. To expand on this success, make the feedback process a core expectation:

Ask students to write down responses using a simple Keep, Stop, Start format. What assignment, activity, or resource should I definitely keep doing? What is confusing or wasting time that I should stop doing? What is missing that I should start doing (e.g., more examples, clearer review sessions)?

The critical follow-up? You must acknowledge and act. Dedicate five minutes in the following class to share what you learned and announce one or two specific changes you plan to implement immediately. This shows your students that their effort is valued and that their perspective actively shapes the course.

You might get suggestions that cannot be implemented, like removing a complex group project, but this then becomes an opportunity for transparency. By explaining the reasons behind why you’ve implemented that activity or project that is grinding your students’ gears, you help them see the activity not as busywork, but as a deliberate and important component of their growth

Holding Up the Mirror: Your Personal Audit

Once you have the student feedback, hold it up against your own internal practices. This personal reflection is crucial for turning raw data into effective action. Ask yourself the uncomfortable questions:

  • Did I adequately scaffold? If students struggled with a complex problem, did I spend too long on easy topics and rush through the challenging, necessary steps? We often assume prior knowledge that just isn’t there.
  • Was my communication transparent? Were the expectations transparent? Were grading criteria specific and clear, or did they lead to predictable confusion?
  • Am I fostering engagement? If students mentioned difficulty focusing, reflect on the classroom environment. Am I fostering inclusivity? Did I encourage participation from a diverse range of students, or did a few voices dominate the discussion every time?

Turning Insight into High-Impact Action

Don’t try to fix everything at once. Focus on one or two high-impact changes derived from your reflection. Self-evaluation is useless without a plan, but the plan needs to be manageable. 

For example, if student feedback points to a lack of practice models, your goal for the rest of the term could be: “Implement one low-stakes quiz at the start of every unit, specifically designed to model the complexity and format of the final exam questions.” This focused effort makes the change visible to students and dramatically improves their preparation. I implemented this practice myself and not only did I receive positive feedback, exams scores on the next exam were considerably higher!

The Professional Payoff

Ultimately, the mid-semester self-evaluation is an act of professional integrity. By proactively seeking feedback and revising your strategies, you seize control of your development. You shift your role from a content deliverer to an educational designer. This practice reduces the sting of negative end-of-semester reviews because you have already identified and addressed problems when they mattered most. You leave the term with documented successes, clear data on what didn’t work, and specific, measurable goals for your next iteration. I’d also be willing to bet that you’ll see improvements in your end of semester evaluations because of the trust you fostered by valuing the insights and opinions of your students.

By making the mid-semester pause a non-negotiable part of your teaching rhythm, you move beyond merely judging your performance and actively commit to professional mastery.

Tips from Student Experience Experience Project: Three to Thrive

Three to Thrive: Small Changes. Big Impact.  

SEP logo

Three easy-to-implement teaching practices to improve the student experience. 

Welcoming Environment: “Sharing Experiences to Build Connection” 

Building a welcoming environment is an ongoing practice of pausing, connecting, and recognizing the people behind the coursework. Taking short, intentional moments to share experiences reminds students that they are part of a community, not just a classroom. 

Here are a few simple ways to weave connection into your class: 

  • Weekend Warm-Up: Begin class with a quick, low-stakes check-in like, “What’s one fun or relaxing thing you did this weekend?” or “What’s something you’re looking forward to this week?” These moments create warmth and help students see each other as peers rather than strangers. 
  • Campus Connection: Highlight campus events or opportunities such as tutoring sessions, game days, student organization fairs, volunteer opportunities, or wellness activities. This reinforces that learning extends beyond the classroom and shows you care about their broader student experience. 
  • Shared Curiosity Moments: Invite students to share something interesting they’ve learned recently, either inside or outside your course. It could be a podcast, a research finding, a community event, or even a social media post related to your discipline, learning, or life. 

Growth Mindset: “Mistakes Welcome Here” 

A growth mindset isn’t just about encouraging effort. It’s about helping students see that mistakes are an essential part of learning. Starting class with a brief reflection or discussion on “what I learned from last week’s missteps” models that mindset and reminds students that progress often comes through trial and error. 

Try these activities to send the message that mistakes are normal, expected, and valuable: 

  • One-Minute Reflection: Ask students to jot down one thing that didn’t go as planned last week, such as an assignment, concept, or study strategy, and what they learned from it. 
  • Pair-Share Conversation: Have students briefly discuss their reflections with a partner to normalize struggle and build community around shared experiences. 
  • Reviewing Common Mistakes: Start class by highlighting common errors from a recent exam or assignment, framing them as collective learning opportunities rather than shortcomings. 

“Several students missed this question, and that’s completely normal—it tells us this concept needs more attention. Let’s take a closer look together.” 

These quick activities can signal that learning is a process that everyone is improving.Shape 

Wise Feedback: “Turning Errors into Insight” 

Give feedback that treats mistakes as milestones toward mastery, not evidence of failure. Wise feedback acknowledges that learning is challenging, affirms students’ ability to improve, and provides clear next steps. 

Practical ideas: 

  • “Feed-forward” Phrasing: focus less on what went wrong, more on how to move forward. 
  • Balanced Feedback: Incorporate one encouraging comment for every corrective one (“I can tell you’re thinking deeply about this. Let’s refine how you applied it here.”). 
  • Tone of Voice: Use video or audio comments to humanize the message. The tone of voice reinforces encouragement. 

Feedback that acknowledges difficulty and provides a path forward fosters trust, reduces defensiveness, and motivates students to keep trying. 


When Theory Becomes Reality: The Day a PR Crisis Exploded in My Classroom

Written by Dr. Shelley Wigley, Department of Communications, The University of Texas at Arlington

Dr. Wigley, who teaches and researches crisis communication and reputation management, never expected a real-time crisis to unfold in their own classroom—a stark, high-stakes moment where academic theory crashed headfirst into reality.

This scenario began during a service-learning course, where students partnered with an organization believed to be a credible nonprofit. Midway through the semester, serious, undisclosed issues were uncovered regarding the organization’s tax-exempt status. This was no hypothetical case study or a classroom simulation; it was a bona fide PR crisis with tangible professional consequences for the students. Their weeks of hard work were suddenly jeopardized, and their professional reputations were at risk. What followed was a turning point for the class—a chance to stop discussing theory and start doing, proving that resilience and ethical agility aren’t just concepts on a slide, but essential skills forged under authentic pressure.

Resilience in the Classroom: Navigating an Unplanned PR Crisis 

I teach and research crisis communication and reputation management. Yet, I never expected a crisis to unfold in real time in my own classroom. 

In one of my service-learning courses during a previous semester, students partnered with what we believed to be a credible nonprofit organization. Midway through the semester, we discovered serious issues with the organization’s nonprofit status that had never been disclosed. This was no longer a classroom simulation. It was an authentic, high stakes learning moment for the students and for me. 

Educator Lessons: Protect, Respond, Pivot 

Once we verified the facts, our immediate priority was to protect students and their work. Together, we took decisive action: 

  • Secured assets: Students gathered media analytics and archived their work for professional use. 
  • Protected reputations: We removed all social media posts and content featuring students’ likeness. 
  • Terminated the partnership: We paused all campaign activities and formally ended the partnership in writing. 

The students were understandably frustrated. They had spent weeks crafting content, building strategy, and representing the client publicly. But this was also a turning point and a chance to pivot and demonstrate what professionalism looks like under pressure. 

Educator Lessons: Building Agility and Resilience 

For students, this situation became an invaluable professional development experience. For educators, it offered a clear illustration of how agility and ethical reasoning can be intentionally fostered in the classroom. 

Key takeaways included: 

  • Agility as a professional competency: Students experienced what it means to make quick, ethical decisions in real time and to adapt strategies when circumstances shift. 
  • Documentation as protection: Because students secured their work immediately, they were able to preserve and present it as a professional accomplishment rather than a loss. 
  • Ethics and accountability at the core: Crises test judgment, but they also shape professional identity. This moment reinforced the importance of instilling ethical reflexes early. 
  • Turning a crisis into narrative capital: Students can now articulate their response to this challenge in job interviews, describing how they navigated uncertainty, acted ethically, and protected their work with professionalism. 

These outcomes did not emerge from a polished lecture or a well-rehearsed scenario. They came from experiencing the discomfort of real-world stakes and learning to respond with agility and integrity. 

Practical Takeaways for Faculty 

This incident also served as a reminder that service-learning, while powerful, comes with real risks. It underscored several practices that can help faculty prepare for and navigate unexpected challenges: 

  • Scenario planning: Build ethical “what if” conversations and crisis simulations into course design so students are better equipped to respond if a real situation emerges. 
  • Model adaptive leadership: Students look to instructors for clarity and steadiness during uncertainty. Modeling calm, decisive action teaches more than lectures ever could. 

Final Reflection 

This was not the semester any of us envisioned. But it was, without question, one of the most meaningful learning experiences we’ve shared. 

Crises in the classroom can be uncomfortable, but they are fertile ground for growth. Students left not only with campaign deliverables but with a story of resilience, adaptability, and ethical decision-making they will carry into their careers. 

And for educators, this was a reminder that classrooms are more than spaces for instruction; they are living laboratories, where theory and practice meet in unexpected ways and where the most powerful lessons often emerge from what we didn’t plan. 

Bio: Dr. Shelley Wigley is an associate professor in the Department of Communication at the University of Texas at Arlington where she teaches graduate courses in persuasion and crisis communication and undergraduate courses in public relations. She has more than a decade of professional public relations experience that includes media training, media relations, and crisis preparation, as well as experience as both a newspaper and broadcast journalist. Her research focuses on resistance to persuasion, crisis communication, media relations, and social media.

Become a Student Experience Project (SEP) Fellow: Join a Community Focused on Student Success

Are you passionate about creating a more supportive learning environment for your students? Would you like to connect with other educators across the UTA to intentionally apply research-based strategies that foster student success?

Consider becoming a Student Experience Project (SEP) Fellow and joining a dynamic community of practice focused on the deliberate integration of student success elements into teaching.

What is the SEP Community of Practice?

Supported by the University of Texas System, the SEP community brings together educators who are committed to enhancing student outcomes through practices that build:

  • Growth Mindset – Encouraging students to see intelligence and abilities as qualities that can be developed.
  • Resilience – Helping students bounce back from challenges and setbacks.
  • Self-Efficacy – Fostering students’ belief in their ability to succeed.
  • Trust – Cultivating strong, respectful student-instructor relationships.
  • Welcoming Environment – Creating inclusive classrooms where all students feel they belong.

By becoming a SEP Fellow, you’ll collaborate with peers across institutions, gain access to evidence-based strategies, and help lead the charge in transforming the student experience in your courses and beyond.


Apply Now!

📝 Application Deadline: November 21st
🔗 Apply here: https://utaedu.questionpro.com/t/AQoqaZ3mwn

Q R Code

For more information about the Student Experience Project, please visit the SEP website, visit the CRTLE website SEP page, or contact Amy Austin (AMAUSTIN@uta.edu) or Heather Arterburn (heathera@uta.edu).


Join us in shaping a more equitable and supportive learning experience—one student, one class, one mindset at a time.

TESTIMONIAL

ICYMI! Recap of October Faculty Voices Session. “From Passive to Participatory: Implementing Regular and Substantive Interaction (RSI) in Large Asynchronous Online Courses”

How do we create meaningful connections with students when teaching hundreds of learners in asynchronous online courses?

That question guided October’s Faculty Voices session led by Dr. Tyler Garner from the Department of Kinesiology. The session demystified Regular and Substantive Interaction (RSI) requirements and demonstrated how faculty can foster genuine engagement at scale without overwhelming their workload.

Understanding RSI: Beyond Compliance

The session opened with a critical distinction: RSI is not just a federal regulation to satisfy—it’s a framework for effective online teaching that directly impacts student success. The 2021 Department of Education clarification defined RSI as an interaction that is instructor-initiated, academic in nature, and predictably scheduled. Regular means interaction follows a predictable schedule, so students know when to expect instructor engagement. Substantive means the interaction focuses on academic content through direct instruction, individualized feedback, content questions and answers, or facilitated discussions.

Since 1992, the Higher Education Act has distinguished legitimate distance education from correspondence courses, but the regulations remained vague until recent years. Cases like Saint Mary of the Woods College losing federal financial aid eligibility in 2011 and Western Governance University facing an Office of Inspector General audit highlighted the real consequences of non-compliance. The session framed RSI as quality teaching, not just compliance—particularly for large online enrollments.

Poster for Implementing Regular and Substantive Interactions in Large Asynchronous Online Courses

What Counts as RSI and What Doesn’t

The session clarified specific activities that meet RSI criteria. According to Department of Education guidelines, substantive interaction requires at least two of the following: providing direct instruction, assessing or giving personalized feedback on coursework, responding to content-related questions, facilitating group discussions, or conducting other approved instructional activities.

Activities that count toward RSI include actively facilitating discussion boards with comments and replies to student posts, posting announcements relevant to course content, providing personalized comments on individual assignments beyond rubric checkmarks, and contacting students with feedback based on exam or assignment performance. Group-level feedback that synthesizes patterns and guides next steps also qualifies.

Activities that do not count include announcements unrelated to course content such as campus events or “grades posted” notices, adding numeric grades without explanatory feedback, welcome messages or general information emails, and unmoderated discussion forums where students interact without instructor presence. The distinction matters because RSI directly influences student retention, belonging, and learning outcomes. The session emphasized that students in large online courses often report never receiving personalized communication from instructors—a gap that RSI practices are designed to address.

Tools That Scale: Panel Insights

A panel featuring Dr. Christy Spivey from Economics, Dr. Heather Arterburn from Biology, and Sarah Suraj from the Center for Distance Education shared practical approaches for implementing RSI in large courses.

Inspire for Faculty emerged as a cornerstone tool for scalable outreach. This Canvas-integrated platform tracks student engagement and allows faculty to send personalized emails to groups of students based on their performance or activity levels. The tool automatically inserts each student’s first name or preferred name, creating individualized messages at scale. Faculty can filter students by engagement level, grade performance, or factors like first-term status or course retake status.

Canvas Grade Book features provide another efficient pathway for targeted communication. Faculty can message students who haven’t submitted assignments, who scored above or below certain thresholds, or whose work hasn’t been graded yet—all without manually tracking down email addresses. The SpeedGrader comment library allows faculty to save reusable comments and then personalize each note to keep feedback substantive while managing time.

Design Plus enhances both course aesthetics and functionality, offering tokens that personalize course pages with student names and quick-check questions that increase engagement with content. The tool helps create interactive experiences that keep students actively processing material rather than passively scrolling, improving page flow and reducing endless scrolling.

H5P provides extensive interactive question types and includes scenario-based branching activities where students choose their learning path. This tool allows learners to explore different theories or approaches, making choices that lead to personalized learning experiences without explicit instructor direction for each pathway. The branching scenarios proved particularly powerful for letting students learn through the consequences of their choices.

Perusall supports social annotation, placing students in small auto-generated groups to read and discuss texts together. The platform’s algorithm can provide initial grading based on time spent and comment quality, which instructors can then review and adjust. This approach allows faculty to engage with groups rather than individual students, making rich discussion more manageable in large courses while letting instructors view students’ thinking traces in context.

Making Students Feel Seen

The panel addressed the challenge of helping students feel valued rather than invisible in large online environments. Key strategies included using smaller discussion groups to reduce intimidation, creating videos with faculty faces and voices to establish presence, and carefully choosing vocabulary that communicates belief in student growth.

Video announcements proved particularly powerful for building instructor presence. Faculty reported that seeing an instructor’s face and hearing their tone transforms the online experience, making abstract course requirements feel personal and supportive. Canvas Studio makes this accessible and allows faculty to embed quiz questions directly in videos for trackable engagement.

The session also highlighted the importance of scaffolding assignments throughout the semester rather than waiting until midterm or finals. Early, low-stakes assignments allow faculty to identify access issues, technology problems, or engagement concerns before they become critical obstacles to success. Pre-programming weekly announcements in Canvas at the start of the semester allows faculty to schedule words of encouragement, exam reminders, and motivational messages that post automatically throughout the term.

Rethinking Discussion Boards and Group Work

Rather than abandoning discussion boards, the session encouraged redesigning them for deeper engagement. Structured prompts that require students to apply, synthesize, or debate concepts—and that ask students to pose questions to their peers—generate more meaningful exchanges than simple recall questions. Breaking large classes into smaller discussion groups allows faculty to respond to groups as a whole rather than individual posts, meeting RSI requirements while managing workload.

For group projects, panelists shared approaches including peer evaluations integrated into Canvas assignments with configurable anonymity and rubrics, role-based grading where each student receives credit for their specific contribution using rotating roles like researcher, presenter, editor, and coordinator, and collaboration grades that multiply the project grade by each student’s teamwork score. Creating team charters for group work explicitly outlines expectations for mutual accountability, recognizing that part of learning group work involves developing leadership and management skills.

Emerging Support: AI and Automation

The session acknowledged emerging AI tools that may support RSI implementation while emphasizing that automation should supplement rather than replace human-led interaction. The university is testing Cloud Force, an AI chatbot that can answer common student questions by drawing from course syllabi and materials, freeing faculty to focus on substantive academic interaction. The goal is to use technology to handle routine policy and syllabus questions so faculty can devote attention to meaningful academic engagement that counts toward RSI.

Key Takeaways

The session reinforced that RSI is an essential federal standard with real consequences for non-compliance, but more importantly, it’s a proven framework for improving student outcomes in online learning. Not all interaction qualifies—it must be instructor-initiated, academic, and predictable. Large course enrollments don’t preclude personalized interaction when faculty use strategic tools and intentional course design.

By leveraging platforms like Inspire for Faculty, Canvas features, Design Plus, H5P, and Perusall, instructors can create genuine connections with students at scale. The key is moving from passive content delivery to participatory learning experiences where students feel recognized, supported, and engaged with both their instructor and the academic material. Presence beats volume—short, targeted videos and specific comments outperform long, generic updates.

Bio: Dr. Tyler Garner is a Clinical Assistant Professor in the Department of Kinesiology at the University of Texas at Arlington’s College of Nursing and Health Innovation. Since joining the department in 2013, he has transitioned from his initial role as a faculty academic advisor to a primary focus on teaching, while continuing to work closely with the advising team to promote student success. His research centers on disability and adaptive sports, examining the physiological and biomechanical responses of individuals with disabilities to exercise, with a particular emphasis on wheelchair sports, performance optimization, and injury prevention. Dr. Garner’s teaching interests include human movement, physiology, sport nutrition, and health promotion, and he is dedicated to fostering an engaging, inclusive learning environment that bridges theory and practice through evidence-based instruction, hands-on learning, and technology-enhanced experiences.

Join the Conversation

How are you structuring predictable, substantive instructor touchpoints in large online courses? What combinations of grouping, peer review, and targeted outreach have worked for you? Which interactive elements, like QuickChecks, H5P, or Perusall, have improved engagement without adding grading load? Share your strategies and insights in the comments, or reach out to the Center for Research on Teaching and Learning Excellence (CRTLE) at CRTLE@uta.edu for support in implementing these approaches in your courses.

Three to Thrive: Feeling the Midterm Malaise?

Three easy-to-implement teaching practices to improve the student experience

1. Welcoming Environment: “10-minute Check-in”

SEP logo

To help students feel more connected and engaged, take the first 10 minutes of class for a quick check-in. This can be done in pairs or small groups, giving everyone a chance to share what they’re working on, ask questions, and highlight any recent progress. After small group discussions, invite a few groups to share insights with the larger class. This simple routine builds community, encourages collaboration, and helps surface useful questions or ideas early on.

Here’s a sample script to get you started:

Let’s take a few minutes to get oriented before we begin. Please respond to the following:

  • What’s one thing you’re currently working on or reviewing from this course?

    (This could be a concept, assignment, or reading.)

    • Is there anything from last class or the materials that you’d like clarified today?

    (Feel free to mention specific topics or questions.)

    • What’s one goal you have for today’s session?

    (Example: understand a concept, make progress on a project, ask a question.)

    • Optional: Is there anything coming up (academic or otherwise) that might affect your participation today?

    (This helps us support each other and plan accordingly.)


    2. Growth Mindset: Embrace Struggles as Learning

    Students often read difficulty as a verdict (“I’m bad at this”) instead of a signal (“Here’s where to focus next”). When we name struggle as expected and pair it with concrete next steps, students persist longer, try better strategies, and learn more.

    Low-Lift Strategies you can implement this week:
    1. 60-second opener: “What tripped you up last time?” Consider using an anonymous posting platform such as Mentimeter or PollEverywhere to invite students to share their struggles without feeling spotlighted.
    2. Error/Strategy Swap: After an activity, have students write down 1 error + 1 new strategy they’ll try next time (e.g., “misread axes; annotate figure before answering”).
    3. Model a flub: Briefly describe a time you got stuck and the exact step that got you unstuck.
    Here’s some student-friendly language to use in class or on Canvas:
    • “Struggle is a signal, not a sentence. It tells us where to work next.”
    • “You’re not there yet. Here’s the next step to get there.”
    • “In this course, mistakes are practice data. We’ll use them to choose better strategies.”
    • “What’s one thing you’ll do differently on the next attempt?”

    3. Wise Feedback: Assessment Wrappers

    After returning a major assignment or exam, take 10–15 minutes to guide students through an assessment wrapper, a short reflective activity that helps them analyze their performance. This is a great tool to use in large enrollment courses.

    Steps to Implement:
    1. After returning a major exam or assignment, provide a short reflection worksheet or prompt.
    2. Ask students to identify what preparation strategies they used, what worked, and what they would change.
    3. Facilitate a brief discussion or collect responses to identify common themes and offer targeted support.
    Benefits:
    1. Encourages metacognitive awareness and self-regulated learning.
    2. Helps students make informed adjustments before final assessments.
    3. Provides instructors with insight into student study habits and challenges.

    Reflecting on Exploring Open Educational Resources: Adopting, Adapting, and Creating for the Classroom 

    By Megan Zara, UTA Libraries

    Recording:

    I was thrilled when Peggy Semingson and the CRTLE team invited me to lead a webinar on Open Education. It’s an exciting moment for the field, and for UTA in particular. To say that UTA is ahead of the curve in Open Education feels like an understatement. We’re not just talking about affordability or access anymore. We’re building a culture of openness that is shaping how we teach, learn, and create knowledge together. 

    Even before the session began, the registration data told a story: UTA faculty already know about OER. Many have used open materials, and a growing number are ready to take their next steps; toward adaptation, creation, and open pedagogy. That readiness was reflected in the energy of the session. I’ve been feeling this shift across campus for some time now, in the kinds of questions faculty and students ask, in how they talk about flexibility and inclusion, and in the way they connect their teaching to broader equity goals. The research backs this up, too. Recent work by Madhav (2024), Noone et al. (2024), Rampelt et al. (2025), Tlili et al. (2025), and Kelly et al. (2025), point to the field’s evolution from a cost-savings model toward a focus on open practice, teaching and learning in ways that are participatory, creative, and learner-centered. 

    This webinar gave us a chance to explore that shift together. It wasn’t just a presentation, it felt like a community moment. I was able to invite several of UTA’s most engaged open educators to share their experiences. Honestly, I couldn’t invite everyone I wanted to; we have so many champions across disciplines that an hour barely scratched the surface. 

    Each speaker offered a glimpse into how Open Education takes shape in real classrooms. 

    Dr. Shelley Wigley, who led a PR Campaigns course that turned her students into collaborators and creators, reflected on how empowering it was to see her students’ research and media projects shared openly through MavMatrix. “They weren’t just making assignments; they were making something that could help others,” she said. That sense of purpose is at the heart of open pedagogy. 

    Dr. Dylan Parks spoke about his journey writing Microbiomes: Health and the Environment through a UTA CARES grant. He offered grounded, candid advice about the process, celebrating both the excitement and the reality of publishing openly. His reminder to “start simple, then build as you learn” resonated with many in the audience who are considering their first OER project. 

    Dr. Rebecca Mauldin, author of one of Mavs Open Press’s most adopted books, emphasized impact. She shared stories of students who felt seen and supported because their professor cared enough to remove cost barriers. “It’s not just about saving money,” she said. “It’s about belonging.” 

    And Dr. David Arditi, who recently finished his open textbook, Keepin’ Up with Popular Culture, highlighted the creative autonomy that comes with open licensing: “You don’t have to wait for permission to share what you know. You can build something that reflects your values and your students’ needs.” He also pointed to a bigger ripple: Open Education nudges scholarly publishing toward models that value access, reuse, and community impact. For him, publishing openly is not just a textbook choice. It is a stance on how knowledge should circulate, be remixed, and count in our professional lives. 

    Those reflections captured exactly what I hoped this session would show: Open Education is not a one-size-fits-all approach. It’s a mindset. It’s a way of working that values collaboration, flexibility, and human connection as much as it values access. 

    In my part of the session, I introduced some of the evolving supports we’ve built at UTA Libraries to help faculty and students along this path. Our OER subject guide now includes a growing list of tools, finders, and trackers. The OER Matchmaking Service pairs faculty with curated resources, saving hours of initial searching. Our new Open Education Research and Planning Mini-Grant helps participants explore the OER landscape in their field while earning the first four badges of the Trailblazers Badge Program. And through the Open Education Trailblazers initiative itself, we’re intentionally creating space for both educators and students to learn, design, and advocate together. 

    That last piece matters deeply to me. Faculty have led the way in so many incredible projects, but the next chapter of UTA’s open story has to include student voices. I want students to help co-create the narrative of what learning looks like when it’s truly open, when curiosity and creativity lead. 

    One of the most meaningful parts of the webinar was watching attendees connect the dots between their own teaching goals and the potential of Open Education. Many shared in the chat that they’ve been searching for ways to make their courses more inclusive, adaptable, and relevant. Others said they finally understood that OER isn’t only about free textbooks, it’s about freedom in teaching. That recognition feels like the beginning of something larger. 

    As I closed the session, I reflected on how far we’ve come. When I first started in this role, much of the conversation around OER centered on discovery and adoption. Those remain vital foundations, but now I see educators reimagining their courses, questioning traditional publishing models, and embracing the idea that knowledge should be shared, not gated. We are, in many ways, trailblazing what Open Education can look like at a comprehensive public university. 

    There’s more to do, of course. More stories to tell, more resources to build, more bridges between faculty and students. But this webinar reminded me why the work is so energizing, it’s not about convincing people anymore. It’s about supporting the momentum that’s already here. 

    As I look ahead, I’m eager to keep these conversations going, to help more educators and students see themselves as part of UTA’s open community, and to keep showing that openness is not just a value; it’s a practice we live together. 


    Kelly, A. E., Avila, B. N., & Schell, A. C. (2025). Students as co-authors: Achievement emotions, beliefs about writing, and OER publishing decisions. Open Praxis, 17(1), 21–33. https://doi.org/10.55982/openpraxis.17.1.745 

    Madhav, N. (2024). Optimising open educational Resources and practises to enable inclusive education. Teacher Education through Flexible Learning in Africa (TETFLE), 6, 165–184. https://doi.org/10.35293/tetfle.v6i1.5040 

    Noone, J., Champieux, R., Taha, A., Gran-Moravec, M., Hatfield, L., Cronin, S., & Shoemaker, R. (2024). Implementing open educational resources: Lessons learned. Journal of Professional Nursing, 55, 65–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.profnurs.2024.08.005 

    Rampelt, F., Ruppert, R., Schleiss, J., Mah, D.-K., Bata, K., & Egloffstein, M. (2025). How do AI educators use open educational Resources? A cross-sectoral case study on OER for AI education. Open Praxis. https://doi.org/10.55982/openpraxis.17.1.766 

    Tlili, A., Zhang, X., Lampropoulos, G., Salha, S., Garzón, J., Bozkurt, A., Huang, R., & Burgos, D. (2025). Uncovering the black box effect of epen educational Resources (OER) and practices (OEP): A meta-analysis and meta-synthesis from the perspective of activity theory. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 12(1), 504. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-04644-y 

    ICYMI: The Faculty Playbook for Teaching: Award-Winning Strategies for a Better Classroom (9/26)

    Our lightning round faculty talks inaugural event on teaching on 9/26 was so much fun. We learned so much in this microlearning event.

    Eight award-winning faculty shared their wisdom at this HyFlex event. We had over 70 join online which speaks to the power of having virtual join options. My mom joined us! The recording and recap will be posted by tomorrow! Stay tuned for two more events like this in the spring. NOTE: Views are the perspectives of individual faculty and not that of UT Arlington or CRTLE.

    Our slogan for this event: “Micro learning, macro impact.”

    The speakers presented short, practical ideas ranging from math vignettes to foster close student attention, to poetry exercises that build a sense of belonging. A consistent theme was the importance of connection, vulnerability, and continuous feedback to boost student self-efficacy and improve teaching.

    The strategies shared focused on intellectual engagement, personal connection, emotional vulnerability, and feedback loops.

    The recording is here: https://youtu.be/8J-N5FYpU8M

    Dr. Barbara Shipman (Math Department)

    Strategy: Uses a flawed mathematical proof to make a sensational claim (that the weight of an ant equals the weight of a bear) to force students to pay close attention and find the hidden error (the square root of a negative value).

    “Ask them if they believe your argument. You can do it correctly or incorrectly, but either way the students have to decide.”


    Dr. Rebecca Deen (Political Science/Assoc. Dean)

    Strategy: Emphasizes building a sense of belonging and self-efficacy through personal connection, such as sharing a memorable detail like “My dog has fleas” or engaging in small acts of kindness for students.

    “The single best predictor of whether a student has an extraordinary time in college is whether or not they get to know at least one faculty member well enough so that they stay in touch with them for the rest of their lives.”


    Dr. Diane Mitschke (School of Social Work)

    Strategy: Uses the “Where I’m From” poem as an icebreaker to have students write about their background, senses, and paradigms. This activity instantly breaks down barriers, develops empathy, and sets the groundwork for discussions on difficult issues.”

    “What it does is it breaks down barriers instantly because as students stand up in front of the room and present themselves to the rest of the class. It develops an empathy around these stories and it helps students to see one another as having shared experiences…”


    Dr. Ken Roemer (English)

    Strategy: Implements a continuous feedback system where students spend the last five minutes of class writing an ungraded response to two questions (one macro question about the class’s main focus and one micro question about a moving moment). This simple, continuous feedback loop empowers students by showing they are teaching the instructor.

    “How can we get a much better sense of feedback from our students? I wanted something that was continuous feedback, not just thing poked at the end of the course.”


    Dr. Frank Foss (Organic Chemistry)

    Strategy: Focused on changing the perception and use of office hours, moving away from “by appointment only” to enhance his understanding of student thought processes and improve his own teaching.

    “This is your connection hour. Try and say, well, yeah, let’s talk. Sit down. Tell me about yourself. What are you trying to do? What are you interested in? How do you think this class is going to fit into what you’re doing? Have you ever considered a life as a chemist? Have you done research? You know? Ask them questions, get them engaged.”


    Dr. Peggy L. Semingson (Host/Moderator from CRTLE)

    Strategy: As the moderator, she briefly shared a literacy-based strategy, endorsing the use of the “Where I’m From” poem Diane shared about because it resonates universally and provides students with a powerful voice through writing.

    “I think in these hard time, these trying times, sometimes when we feel like our voices are silenced, when students can write, I think, I think that’s great.”


    Dr. Karen Magruder (School of Social Work)

    Strategy: Karen shared four techniques that supported asynchronous online teaching including: 1) providing a syllabus overview video 2) a humanizing introduction video from the professor 3) assignment overview videos and 4) email responsiveness.

    She has an amazing YouTube channel! https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC2LVhrI0ulnIjeio_yDiBFQ


    Dr. Nila Veerabathina (Physics Department)

    Strategy: Dr. Nila is an expert at active learning and shared her technique of “Take a Stand if it’s You!”. This teaching activity designed for face-to-face engagement that encourages students to move and interact. The strategy is highly versatile, working effectively with both small classes (under 20) and large classes (200+), and can be implemented in any subject area, making it especially valuable for comparative analysis of concepts or case studies. Instructors can use it as a quick 5–10 minute activity or expand it to fill a full class period, with the option to divide the class into two or multiple groups depending on the topic being addressed.


    *This post was co-written with Google Gemini.

    Faculty Playbook flyer

    The original description of this event is below. We hope to host at least two more similar events in the Spring of 2026. Stay tuned!

    From innovative engagement techniques to proven assessment methods, these talks are designed to be a “faculty playbook” of actionable strategies you can implement in your own classroom immediately. Whether you’re looking to spark student curiosity, streamline your workflow, or simply refine your teaching style, you’ll walk away with fresh ideas and a renewed sense of purpose. 

    • Participants will be able to identify and describe at least three new, practical teaching strategies presented by award-winning faculty that can be immediately implemented in their own courses. 
    • Participants will gain an understanding of how small, specific changes in teaching practices can lead to significant improvements in student engagement, comprehension, and overall learning outcomes. 
    • Participants will be inspired to reflect on their own teaching methods and motivated to experiment with innovative techniques to enhance their classroom effectiveness.