UT-AI?:Talking to Students about Artificial Intelligence

Post by Dr. Karen Magruder, School of Social Work (Faculty Profile)

In this informative and practical blog post, award-winning faculty member, Dr. Karen Magruder shares insights into getting started with teaching students about AI. –Peggy Semingson, Interim Director of CRTLE

A few additional resources:

picture of Dr. Karen Magruder

It’s no secret that artificial Intelligence (AI) is rapidly transforming the landscape of higher education. Serious and valid concerns about AI have been raised, including academic dishonesty, misinformation, and bias. On the other hand, AI can boost efficiency, enhance creativity, and provide personalized learning experiences. Regardless of whether you deem AI a friend or foe, it is our professional obligation to equip our learners with digital literacy skills to navigate a technology that is increasingly being embraced in today’s workplaces. As educators, it’s essential to navigate this new technological frontier with clear expectations and guidelines for AI use in the classroom.

Setting Clear AI Expectations
Opinions on AI use vary widely among students and faculty alike, and we should not hold students accountable to expectations we haven’t clearly articulated. While an AI statement in the syllabus is an important first step, AI expectations should also be reviewed in detail through an in-class discussion or video announcement. A syllabus quiz or academic integrity attestation can also ensure accountability. Beyond sharing what they should or should not use AI for, it’s critical to explain why these boundaries exist; “because I said so” does not cut it! Focusing on how avoiding overreliance on AI will aid them in their careers, with specific and relevant examples, can increase buy-in. While the nuances of AI ethics are complex, and binary advice doesn’t apply to all situations, having memorable guidelines can help. Transparency and context are two key metrics that can guide students in understanding when AI use is appropriate.

AI Guideposts: Context and Transparency

  1. Context: Understanding the Purpose of Education vs. Professional Practice.

Academics
In academic settings, we are tasked with measuring students’ mastery of learning outcomes. Have scholars developed the knowledge & skills that will be critical for their professional success? Overreliance on AI to complete assignments can undermine this purpose. Therefore, some tasks that should be completed independently in school may eventually be supplemented with AI after the skill is mastered.  For example, just as students are first taught to perform calculations by hand to build a strong foundation in math before being allowed to use calculators, students should develop core writing, analysis, and problem-solving skills independently before incorporating AI tools to enhance efficiency and productivity.

Workplace
In some career settings, AI is prohibited. For example, we know that some academic publishers have strict rules about AI-generated content. On the other hand, in many professional environments, AI is already being embraced as a valuable tool for tasks such as drafting emails, creating presentations, or analyzing data.

In other professional contexts, using AI is not only acceptable but also highly beneficial. Encouraging students to explore AI tools now can help them develop valuable skills that are increasingly in demand in the workforce, such as prompt engineering, critical evaluation of AI-generated content, and effective integration of AI into workflows. Just as professionals use AI to streamline tasks like content creation and client communication, students can benefit from learning how to leverage these tools responsibly. By allowing opportunities to experiment with AI in low-stakes assignments or as a supplement to their own work, educators can help students build confidence and competence in using AI thoughtfully and ethically.

2. Transparency: Would You Be Comfortable if Everyone Knew You Used AI?
A useful metric for students is the “transparency test”: If everyone knew you used AI to complete an assignment, would you be comfortable with that? If the answer is no, it might suggest that AI is being used inappropriately. Transparency promotes honesty and accountability, encouraging students to use AI as an “above board” tool for learning rather than a sly shortcut to bypass effort.

The AI Assistant Analogy: Guidance and Training Required
A helpful way to think about AI is to imagine it as an intern—eager to help but needing guidance and training. Just as it’s perfectly acceptable to brainstorm with a colleague or ask them to review a draft, it’s also reasonable (in some contexts) to use AI to assist with idea generation or proofreading. However, outsourcing an entire academic assignment to AI is akin to asking a classmate to write a paper for them—compromising the authenticity of their work and the integrity of their learning.

Effective use of AI requires us to set boundaries and train it to work according to our standards, much like onboarding a new assistant. This means refining AI prompts, critically reviewing its outputs, and ensuring that the final work reflects the student’s unique voice.

Are your assignments AI-proof?
Even with clear guidance and rationale, the temptation to take an AI shortcut is strong. AI-proofing involves designing assessments (both low-stakes and graded) to minimize the risk of students relying solely on AI to complete them while maximizing opportunities for authentic learning and critical thinking. Activities like oral presentations, synchronous discussions, in-class writing, fast-paced interactive polling games like Kahoot, or role-plays can also reduce AI’s utility.

Modeling Appropriate AI Use

Banishing AI is becoming increasingly unrealistic. As instructors, we can model appropriate and ethical use of AI to enhance, not diminish, learning. For example cross-disciplinary AI-infused teaching activities with step-by-step implementation guidance, check out UTA’s newly released OER AI Powered Education: Innovative Teaching Strategies to Elevate Student Learning. [link]

Conclusion: Embracing AI Ethically and Responsibly
AI in both work and education is not a passing trend but a growing reality. Embracing its potential responsibly involves recognizing its drawbacks, setting clear guidelines, and helping students understand the ethics of its use. By focusing on transparency and context, educators can empower students to embrace AI appropriately—maximizing its benefits while maintaining the integrity of their learning journey.

Encouraging students to explore AI tools now can help them develop valuable skills that are increasingly in demand in the workforce, such as prompt engineering, critical evaluation of AI-generated content, and effective integration of AI into workflows.

RECAP:  CRTLE Faculty Lounge, 3/19/2025 

OER and the Open Access Journey: New Frontiers for Faculty 

Recording Link (requires UTA credentials to access): March Faculty Lounge on OER (led by Rosie Kallie)-20250319_120422-Meeting Recording.mp4

Facilitator:  Rosie Kallie (RK), Industrial, Manufacturing, and Systems Engineering 

Special Guest:  Megan Zara (MZ), Open Educational Resources (OER) Librarian 

Panelists:  Kimberly Breuer (KB) (History and Geography), Karishma Chatterjee (KC) (Communication), Jessica Kahlow (JK) (Instructional Design), Shelley Wigley (SW) (Communication) 

Motivation:  As faculty assessing new course books and materials for classes, at first glance, we likely use our faculty perspective.  For example, topics covered, types of examples presented, scope and sequence.  The price may seem reasonable to us.  From the student perspective, students like to see copious examples at a low cost.  The example Rosie Kallie presented was for an engineering textbook at $124.95, reasonably priced from a faculty perspective. However, for a student who is homeless or with other obligations, the price may be out of reach. 

Open Access (OA) and Open Educational Resources (OER):  Zara gave a brief introduction to the world of OA and OER.   OA grants free, unrestricted access to research outputs, peer-reviewed, like journal articles, books, etc, but licensing may be restrictive.  OERs are free resources focused on teaching and learning.  Additionally, OERs may have more open licensing, allowing them to be customized and shared. Examples of OERs are textbooks, videos, etc.  UTA libraries offers grant funding for faculty to pursue OA/OER projects. Cost savings for UTA students last fall exceeded $5 million (US dollars). 

Panelists Questions with excerpts of responses: 

*Regarding the Impact of OA and OER:   How has the OER resource(s) impacted your students?  How has the OER journey impacted you as an educator? 

As committed educators, the panelists were searching for relevant course materials with the appropriate scope and sequence of topics while also engaging their students throughout the course. 

JK remarked how students liked that the OER text could be saved then it was easy to access throughout the semester.  As an educator holding a wealth of Best Practices, creating a new OER book gave JK incentive to write everything down as book content.   

SW stated that the impact on students is positive since students themselves created content for the book. Thus, students have more buy-in, more dedication on the assignments, etc they are creating. They can point potential employers to their contributions within the OER. They feel empowered because their work will help students, here and abroad, who use their OER.  Last, SW notes that working on the OER has re-energized her creativity as an educator.  

KC mentioned how students loved saving money by using an OER book (zero cost), loved the easy access to the OER book as well as seeing communications examples that cater to engineering and science students.  Last, as an educator, KC stated that her OER journey is still evolving; the next step is reviewing this semester’s data from faculty and students, then tweaking the OER. 

KB noted the History Department began looking for lower-cost resources for their online students, as an alternative to expensive traditional textbooks.  She began searching for online books, if they existed.  She located a short textbook on U.S. History on the State Department website.  The department has expanded the Zero Cost materials to other courses as well.  As an educator, KB remarked that the OER journey is both gratifying and terrifying. Last, the process takes longer than you think. 

*Regarding Motivation toward OA and OERHow did you get started with OER or Open Access?   As you review the insights, you will note a common theme of availability. 

JK spoke of not being able to find desired resources for a course, “Assessment and Evaluation in Online Learning,” a book that would combine theory, best practices, and implementation.  

KB was looking for resources that could replace a $100 textbook on “History of Science and Technology” along with a holistic approach, that is, the add-ons that publishers advertise like question banks, etc. 

KC was not able to find just the right book for a Communications course focused on science and engineering students, a large service course of 20 sections each semester.  A more recent book in use was expensive (over $100), expansive, yet professors felt overwhelmed by content, but only a small portion of the book was actually being used. A different approach was to create a shorter, focused OER with specific content. 

SW did not find an existing book to fit the need of the “Public Relations Campaigns” course, the experiential capstone course required for PR majors.  Creating an OER that would serve as a guide book for quick reference throughout the semester would be a better fit for the students. 

*Regarding Obstacles or Advice on an OA and OER journey:   What obstacles did you face, and how did you overcome them?  and/or What advice, tips, or considerations would you share with others?  

Possible obstacles:   Time management since the OER project does take a lot of time. Set a schedule to write every day (e.g. 20 min). Getting the students to a place where they understand how they want their work to be licensed.  Published-unpublished resources.  Collaborators change jobs. 

Advice:  Interact with the OER librarian more, e.g. to help make the OER more interactive.  For moral support, join the Professional Learning Community (PLC) for Open Education Open Access. Get Grad Students to help. If stuck, a change of scenery helps (e.g. eat outside).  Once you find the first OER source, it opens up your thinking to how can I update my education practices in other ways. 

Some Key Take-Aways:   There are lots of resources available.  There is support for you; it is not a lonely journey.   The OA, OER journey is different for everyone.  You can start small with homework, chapter readings, etc.  You will learn something new in the process.